Hwo many entries does wiki reader9/7/2023 Think of monads as a kind of type-disciplined approach to " pipelines" inside your program. The monad is a kind of meta-strategy for combining computations into more complex computations. More than this, however, monads help make strategies composable. And I/O makes it possible to interact with a program at all. And then there's the Maybe type, which rescues you from having to write lots of null pointer checks - or else debug code that doesn't have enough of them. The List solves a common problem: you need a very basic collection of items of the same type, with some easy-to-understand behavior and performance characteristics. In this sense, the concept of the monad resembles what's been called " cross-cutting concerns" in software engineering. As do most other monads predefined for you.Īs much as anything, monads are strategies for solving coding problems that recur often, regardless of what you're writing. (A mathematician might say it's a degenerate case.) But monads like List have a little more. Admittedly, some very simple monads like Maybe don't have much work to flow in the first place. It's a way to describe how to get things done. He pointed out that in F#, they are called "workflows", a term he deemed very sensible. Perhaps one of the most helpful glosses of "monad" in Haskell's sense comes from Simon Peyton-Jones. Unless you arrived at this tutorial with little or no experience with Haskell, you've already used several monads: the List, the Maybe type, and I/O.īut what does it even mean? "Monad" sounds forbiddingly mathematico-philosophical. Nor are you completely lacking in experience with them. If you're anxious about where to start with Haskell monads, you're not alone. A monad is "an endofunctor (a functor mapping a category to itself), together with two natural transformations required to fulfill certain coherence conditions." (Wikipedia) Admit it: unless you're fresh from studying abstract algebra, you just died a little inside. It could pound the last nail in the coffin of your ambitions to understand what "monad" means in Haskell. Consider the introduction to the definition of "monad" in category theory. Nor are mathematicians riding to your rescue. Has it ever?) Neither philosophical sense will help you understand the role of monads in Haskell. But then it comes in again later from the philosopher Leibniz, for whom it meant "almost nothing" - an irreducible particle of perceptual reality. "Monad" enters English from ancient Greek philosophy, where it could mean "almost everything". The history of the word won't exactly relieve your confusion. You may have heard "monad" for the first time only from looking at Haskell. Words like "data" or "type" have commonsense meanings, and these help with very some specific meanings that you can grasp in Haskell (and other programming languages.) With "monad", well. It doesn't help that the word itself is obscure. sometimes, with great power comes great (apparent) nonsensicality. You've probably heard that monads are a very powerful code-structuring technique, but. If you're approaching Haskell monads a little nervously, that's understandable. Understanding Monads Introduction What is a monad? 3.7.2 An example with multiple transformers.3.6 More examples with monad transformers.3.4.2 Transformer versions of standard monads.3.4.1 The MonadTrans and MonadIO classes.1.6.8.1 Functions for use with MonadPlus.1.6.5.1 Conditional monadic computations.1.6.2.2 Monadic versions of list functions.1.6.1.4 The reverse binder function (=1.5.4 Exercise 4: Using the Monad class constraint.1.5.2 Exercise 2: Combining monadic values. 1.1.2 Why should I make the effort to understand monads?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |